Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Quantitative and qualitative approaches in the study of poverty and adolescent development : separation or integration?|
|Authors:||Leung, Janet T. Y.|
Shek, Daniel T. L.
|Publisher:||Walter de Gruyter|
|Source:||International journal of adolescent medicine and health, June 2011, v. 23, no. 2, p. 115-121.|
|Abstract:||This paper examines the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches to study the impact of economic disadvantage on family processes and adolescent development. Quantitative research has the merits of objectivity, good predictive and explanatory power, parsimony, precision and sophistication of analysis. Qualitative research, in contrast, provides a detailed, holistic, in-depth understanding of social reality and allows illumination of new insights. With the pragmatic considerations of methodological appropriateness, design flexibility, and situational responsiveness in responding to the research inquiry, a mixed methods approach could be a possibility of integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches and offers an alternative strategy to study the impact of economic disadvantage on family processes and adolescent development.|
|Rights:||©2011 by Walter de Gruyter. The journal web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijamh|
|Appears in Collections:||APSS Journal/Magazine Articles|
All items in the PolyU Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. No item in the PolyU IR may be reproduced for commercial or resale purposes.