<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PolyU IR Community: Chinese Culture</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4437</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Community's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://repository.lib.polyu.edu.hk/jspui/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>宋太宗朝外戚名將李繼隆(950-1005) = The military career of Li Jilong, the most distinguished member of the Empress Clan during the reign of Emperor Song Taizong</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4572</link>
      <description>Title: 宋太宗朝外戚名將李繼隆(950-1005) = The military career of Li Jilong, the most distinguished member of the Empress Clan during the reign of Emperor Song Taizong&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Ho, Koon-wan (何冠環)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: 李繼隆是宋太祖(960-976在位)從龍大功臣、樞密副使李處耘(920-966)長子，太宗明德李皇后(960-1004)之長兄。他既是功臣子弟，又是帝戚，加上他能征善戰，從太祖晚年開始，便得到太祖和太宗兄弟的重用。從太祖開寶八年(975)征南唐之役始，到太宗太平興國四年(979)平北漢之戰，以及太宗一朝對遼對夏的大小戰役，包括高梁河之戰、滿城之戰、岐溝關之戰、君子館之戰、唐河、徐河之戰、夏州之戰及第一次靈州之戰，李繼隆以騎將身份，統率馬軍，幾乎無役不與，而屢立戰功； 不過，他也有好幾回恃太宗的寵信違紀敗師，為時人所非議。他以后兄貴戚的地位，在內執掌禁旅, 在外統兵出征, 成為太宗一朝最有權勢的武將。太宗用人惟親，最喜用他的藩邸舊臣及外戚統領軍隊，因而在宋初軍事上付出高昂的代價。李繼隆在泰半平庸的外戚武將中，論戰功與用兵韜略，卻是卓爾不群的，稱得上是一代名將。時人比之為漢代的衛青(?-前106)和霍去病(前145-前117)。不過，因李皇后在太宗死後企圖廢立真宗(997-1022在位)失敗，李繼隆受牽連被罷軍職, 投閒置散多年, 直至景德元年(1004)遼軍南侵，他才得以重上沙場，建立最後的功勳。; This paper attempts to critically analysis the military career of Li Jilong, the elder brother of Empress Li, who was known to be the most distinguish imperial relative general during the reign of Emperor Sung Taizong(r.976-997). General Li made a record in early Northern Song that he participated in almost every battle that the Song army fought against the Khitan Liao and the Tangut Xia, the two major military rivals of Song. Being the imperial relative of Emperor Taizong, General Li was delegated with full trust and power to command his army.  It is worthy to note, as the field commander, General Li did not always follow the orders from his chief-commanders including the emperor.  As a matter of fact, he did win some great battles but equally lost quite a number in his entire military career.  Being one of the most senior commanders in the imperial troops and holding the status of imperial relative, he could not exempted from the power struggle inside and outside the court.  When his younger sister, Empress Li, lost in the power struggle shortly after Emperor Song Taizong died, General Li was forced to retire at his age of 48.  He had to wait for another 7 years until he regained the trust from the new emperor that allowing him to return to the battlefield.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>《全宋文》所收碑銘之宋初內臣史料初考 = A preliminary study of the source materials of the early Northern Sung eunuchs from the stone inscriptions compiled in the Complete Sung Prose</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4571</link>
      <description>Title: 《全宋文》所收碑銘之宋初內臣史料初考 = A preliminary study of the source materials of the early Northern Sung eunuchs from the stone inscriptions compiled in the Complete Sung Prose&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Ho, Koon-wan (何冠環)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: 本文分別考辨宋初內臣二十六人之生平事蹟，主要取材自《全宋文》第一至第八冊所收載的碑銘題記，並參用對照數種《全宋文》未收錄之宋人碑銘集，以及北宋史研究的幾種基本史料如《宋史》、《續資治通鑑長編》、《宋會要輯稿》，另及相關的宋人文集與筆記。本文所考之宋初內臣中，既有位高權重之大檔，也有名不見經傳的小黃門。透過這些相關的考述，無疑能在史料上大大補充了宋史研究者對宋初內臣各方面之認識。; This article provides with scholars of Song studies the supplementary source materials on early Northern Sung eunuchs.  These source materials are basically extracted from the stone inscription that have been recently compiled in the canonical work Complete Sung Prose (vol.1 to 8).  In this article, the accounts of twenty-six eunuchs prevailed in early Northern Sung Dynasty were examined.  Some of the eunuchs mentioned in the article were high-ranking and possessed great influence in court politics, some were merely struggling at the bottom of the hierarchy and never know by historians.  The article would undoubtedly enrich our understandings of the Northern Sung eunuchs at all aspects.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>北宋内臣蓝元震事迹考</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4566</link>
      <description>Title: 北宋内臣蓝元震事迹考&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Ho, Koon-wan (何冠環)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: 本文據現存史料，對藍元震的生平事蹟作一考述。</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>王國維尋死原因三說質疑</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4530</link>
      <description>Title: 王國維尋死原因三說質疑&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Chak, Chi-shing (翟志成)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: 王國維為何投湖自盡一直都是一個聚訟不休的議題。 這些議論又足可大率歸為四大類。亦即: (一)殉清說、(二)討債逼死說、(三)殉文化說、(四)紅色恐怖逼死說。前三種說法分別在不同的歷史時段主宰了話語的霸權。殉清說是民國時期的主流論述，討債逼死就是中共立國至文革時期的主流論述，殉文化說是文革時期的主流論述，而紅色恐怖逼死說則一直被驅逐到話語的邊陲。本文的主要努力，在於質疑殉清說、討債逼死說和殉文化說，是如何經不起事實、常識和邏輯的檢驗，以為紅色恐怖逼死說的確立，掃除主要的障礙。</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

